The Owen Sound Sun Times e-edition

How to fight climate change without a tax

LORRIE GOLDSTEIN lgoldstein@postmedia.com

New Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre claims he can reduce Canada's industrial greenhouse gas emissions without a national carbon tax. So does U.S President Joe Biden.

That's not the view of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau. He says a national carbon tax/ price is the most effective way to reduce emissions linked to climate change.

Which raises the question: Why has the U.S. been more successful at cutting emissions than Canada?

Both countries had targets of reducing emissions to

17 per cent below 2005 levels by 2020. The Americans, without a national carbon tax, reduced them by 21 per cent. Canada, with a tax, reduced them by nine per cent.

The difference goes all the way back to former Liberal PM Jean Chretien signing Canada onto the United Nations Kyoto climate accord in 1997. That committed Canada to reducing emissions to an average of six per cent below 1990 levels from 200812, though a senior aide to Chretien later admitted the Liberals knew they couldn't hit that target.

The U.S., despite global warming guru Al Gore being vice-president in the Bill Clinton administration at the time, rejected Kyoto after the U.S. Senate said it would damage the American economy.

U.S. president Barack Obama, who signed the Paris climate accord along with Trudeau in 2015, failed to introduce a national cap-andtrade system in 2010 for the same reason.

What the Americans did, which Canada didn't do, was to let market forces lower emissions.

For example, while Canadian provinces were banning fracking, the Americans used it to free up huge natural gas reserves, making it economically advantageous to replace coal-fired electricity with natural gas. Because natural gas burns at half the carbon-intensity of coal, U.S. emissions fell dramatically.

The G-7, of which Canada and the U.S. are members, and the European Union, classify natural gas as a transitional form of green energy.

All of which brings us to Biden's Us$370-billion climate plan approved by Congress in August, which doesn't include a national carbon tax.

It earmarks hundreds of billions of dollars for U.S. consumers to buy electric vehicles and other green energy products and services and for America's manufacturing and industrial sectors to develop and adopt new sources of green energy.

It also gives America's oil and gas sector greater access to offshore drilling in the Gulf of Mexico and Alaska, expanded tax credits for coal- and natural gas-fired electricity plants that use carbon capture technology, incentives to build wind and solar projects in areas where coal mines or coal plants have closed, and $60 billion to low-income and minority communities disproportionately affected by climate change.

It includes penalties for industries exceeding U.S. methane emission limits starting in 2024, but nothing that comes close to a national carbon tax as we have here.

Biden promises to lower U.S. emissions to 50 per cent below 2005 levels by 2030, while Trudeau promises a cut of 40 to 45 per cent. We'll see what happens.

OPINION | OPINION

en-ca

2022-10-01T07:00:00.0000000Z

2022-10-01T07:00:00.0000000Z

https://eeditionowensoundsuntimes.pressreader.com/article/281586654479846

Sun Media